diff options
Diffstat (limited to '0002-IOMMU-x86-work-around-bogus-gcc12-warning-in-hvm_gsi.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | 0002-IOMMU-x86-work-around-bogus-gcc12-warning-in-hvm_gsi.patch | 52 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 52 deletions
diff --git a/0002-IOMMU-x86-work-around-bogus-gcc12-warning-in-hvm_gsi.patch b/0002-IOMMU-x86-work-around-bogus-gcc12-warning-in-hvm_gsi.patch deleted file mode 100644 index edc6857..0000000 --- a/0002-IOMMU-x86-work-around-bogus-gcc12-warning-in-hvm_gsi.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,52 +0,0 @@ -From b89b932cfe86556c5de4ad56702aed83142e22a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> -Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:21:14 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH 002/126] IOMMU/x86: work around bogus gcc12 warning in - hvm_gsi_eoi() -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - -As per [1] the expansion of the pirq_dpci() macro causes a -Waddress -controlled warning (enabled implicitly in our builds, if not by default) -tying the middle part of the involved conditional expression to the -surrounding boolean context. Work around this by introducing a local -inline function in the affected source file. - -Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> -Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> -Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> - -[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102967 -master commit: 80ad8db8a4d9bb24952f0aea788ce6f47566fa76 -master date: 2022-06-15 10:19:32 +0200 ---- - xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/hvm.c | 12 ++++++++++++ - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/hvm.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/hvm.c -index 9544f3234e65..50865eec2c04 100644 ---- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/hvm.c -+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/hvm.c -@@ -25,6 +25,18 @@ - #include <asm/hvm/support.h> - #include <asm/io_apic.h> - -+/* -+ * Gcc12 takes issue with pirq_dpci() being used in boolean context (see gcc -+ * bug 102967). While we can't replace the macro definition in the header by an -+ * inline function, we can do so here. -+ */ -+static inline struct hvm_pirq_dpci *_pirq_dpci(struct pirq *pirq) -+{ -+ return pirq_dpci(pirq); -+} -+#undef pirq_dpci -+#define pirq_dpci(pirq) _pirq_dpci(pirq) -+ - static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, dpci_list); - - /* --- -2.37.4 - |