| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is cherry-picked from the upstream gnu/tar repository
which fixes a heap buffer overflow issue in the utility. This fix is
needed to resolve CVE-2022-48303.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/898176
Signed-off-by: Nobel Barakat <nobelbarakat@google.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/29776
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit fa9750b4c24e402475d4edaa1b2ef34f17d945c3.
It appears I was mistaken, and we don't need this patch in the tree, for
within Prefix itself, this issue doesn't occur. See comment #5
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/761322
Signed-off-by: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/761322
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/681728
Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.62, Repoman-2.3.11
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.51, Repoman-2.3.11
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.62, Repoman-2.3.12
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/675140
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.54, Repoman-2.3.12
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch added without new test suite because that would require
an eautoreconf run.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/674210
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.53, Repoman-2.3.12
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.42, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.40, Repoman-2.3.9
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/641508
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.3, Repoman-2.3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch that we were using was from the security authors, not from
the upstream GNU tar project. Turns out their patch breaks creation
of archives that use .. names too. See https://crbug.com/674472#5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gentoo-Bug: 598334
Package-Manager: portage-2.3.2
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28
Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
|
|
This commit represents a new era for Gentoo:
Storing the gentoo-x86 tree in Git, as converted from CVS.
This commit is the start of the NEW history.
Any historical data is intended to be grafted onto this point.
Creation process:
1. Take final CVS checkout snapshot
2. Remove ALL ChangeLog* files
3. Transform all Manifests to thin
4. Remove empty Manifests
5. Convert all stale $Header$/$Id$ CVS keywords to non-expanded Git $Id$
5.1. Do not touch files with -kb/-ko keyword flags.
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
X-Thanks: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> - did the GSoC 2006 migration tests
X-Thanks: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> - infra guy, herding this project
X-Thanks: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gentoo.org> - Former Gentoo developer, wrote Git features for the migration
X-Thanks: Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org> - wrote much python to improve cvs2svn
X-Thanks: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> - validation scripts
X-Thanks: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> - Gentoo dev, running new 2014 work in migration
X-Thanks: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> - scripts, QA, nagging
X-Thanks: All of other Gentoo developers - many ideas and lots of paint on the bikeshed
|