| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Still broken on this arch. Come to think of it, I think I only re-keyworded
2.31.0 for ~x86 by mistake during the version bump.
See commit 1ee253aa6283cbe750d69e62e44fc82d8cc18bfc for the original
reasoning.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/930244
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nb. Yes, I am aware that there is a new isa-l version available
upstream. Unfortunately that version introduces quite a few QA issues
and I haven't had time to resolve them yet.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/829500
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Build failures. Test failures. Even if it did work, it would be rather
slow because the workaround for the former involves disabling
arch-optimised code paths. Upstream comments in the relevant issue
suggest they do not particularly care for 32-bit PCs.
Probably shouldn't have been keyworded for this arch in the first place.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923425
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923347
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
x86-specific optimisations are presently broken - they call assembly
instructions which do not in fact work in 32-bit mode. Until upstream
has either fixed them or declared end of support for this arch, fall
back to the generic code.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/922193
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Amadio <amadio@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For the time being users wishing for isa-l to take advantage of this
instruction set must build it using nasm; everyone else can choose
between nasm and yasm.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/829497
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|
|
Required by erasure-coding features of net-libs/xrootd - or rather WILL
BE required, as at the moment the latter seems to have no option to use
a system-installed version.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org>
|