| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Josiah Mullins <JoMull01@protonmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/23460
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/827058
Signed-off-by: Josiah Mullins <JoMull01@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Josiah Mullins <JoMull01@protonmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/21964
Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems that the upstream developer believes that
the macros NAME_MAX and PATH_MAX are defined in
<limits.h> when they are really defined in
<linux/limits.h>. More interestingly, it seems
that GCC automatically corrects for this while
clang does not. This commit adds patches necessary
to fix this as well as some minor fixes.
Signed-off-by: Josiah Mullins <JoMull01@protonmail.com>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/803404
Signed-off-by: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michael Mair-Keimberger <m.mairkeimberger@gmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/11185
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org>
|
|
Thanks to Felix Janda for reporting the bug and confirming fixes.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/634350
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.13, Repoman-2.3.4
|