| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to Arfrever for reporting, had noticed this in bed last night too.
No real harm done as unkeyworded though.
Fixes: 907791c9cc9b7a5d34201a785e65def0f8597aae
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit replaces the Info page slotting mechanism with simple
INFOPATH setting.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/902461
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/30355
Signed-off-by: Arsen Arsenović <arsen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/902461
Signed-off-by: Arsen Arsenović <arsen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recently, the toolchain-autoconf class was edited not to naively slot
Info pages, breaking them in the process. To prevent existing revisions
from changing contents, TC_AUTOCONF_BREAK_INFOS was added to permit
using old behavior currently.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/902461
Signed-off-by: Arsen Arsenović <arsen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2.73 will be the actual release, this is a snapshot of it before it's released,
as a test.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Needed for some patches on the stable gdb-13.1 branch, mainly for Rust crash.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/897296
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/897296
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't always want Binutils for cross.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This warning is caused by the fortify.h header that has a
system-reserved macro name. This commit simply adds a pragma to tell
Clang that the header is a system header.
I surrounded the pragma with `#ifdef __clang__` and such in case this
header is used for GCC or other compilers, but according to a Gentoo
maintainer, this is not strictly necessary.
I incremented the revision number on 15.0.7-4, 16.0.0, and
17.0.0_pre20230314 but I did not increment them on 16.0.0.999 and
17.0.0.999. I may be wrong, but it doesn't seem like revisions should be
incremented on ebuilds that follow the latest commits of projects.
I thought I had read about that somewhere, but the only source I could
find was [1], and that one did not mention anything about 9999-type
ebuilds and revision numbers.
That said, [2] did have an example where a _pre* ebuild had a revision
number, so I specifically added a revision number to 17.0.0_pre20230314.
Also, [1] said to not add a revision number if the fix is trivial and
would not be worth it with the compile times. However, this package is
trivial to "compile" since it only installs certain files, so I thought
it worth it to increment revisions.
If the Gentoo authors disagree, I don't mind at all, though.
[1]: https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html
[2]: https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#file-naming-rules
Signed-off-by: Gavin D. Howard <gavin@gavinhoward.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/30276
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/894174
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arsen Arsenović <arsen@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/902163
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/902155
Signed-off-by: Arsen Arsenović <arsen@gentoo.org>
|