diff options
author | Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> | 2010-09-27 13:45:35 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> | 2010-09-27 13:45:35 -0700 |
commit | 149762e1c0e5b2f7d9d70ca9db01a400abe9a396 (patch) | |
tree | 5eccb0996241c18c85b99e76aea2e5ad091c563b | |
parent | Bug #337178 - Fix slot conflict backtracking to mask the higher (diff) | |
download | portage-2.1.9.12.tar.gz portage-2.1.9.12.tar.bz2 portage-2.1.9.12.zip |
Merge additional backtracking tests from the master branch.v2.1.9.12
-rw-r--r-- | pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_backtracking.py | 72 |
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_backtracking.py b/pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_backtracking.py index 91a739aaf..41b6d50b6 100644 --- a/pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_backtracking.py +++ b/pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_backtracking.py @@ -30,6 +30,44 @@ class BacktrackingTestCase(TestCase): finally: playground.cleanup() + + def testHittingTheBacktrackLimit(self): + ebuilds = { + "dev-libs/A-1": {}, + "dev-libs/A-2": {}, + "dev-libs/B-1": {}, + "dev-libs/B-2": {}, + "dev-libs/C-1": { "DEPEND": "dev-libs/A dev-libs/B" }, + "dev-libs/D-1": { "DEPEND": "=dev-libs/A-1 =dev-libs/B-1" }, + } + + test_cases = ( + ResolverPlaygroundTestCase( + ["dev-libs/C", "dev-libs/D"], + all_permutations = True, + mergelist = ["dev-libs/A-1", "dev-libs/B-1", "dev-libs/C-1", "dev-libs/D-1"], + ignore_mergelist_order = True, + success = True), + #This one hits the backtrack limit. Be aware that this depends on the argument order. + ResolverPlaygroundTestCase( + ["dev-libs/D", "dev-libs/C"], + options = { "--backtrack": 1 }, + mergelist = ["dev-libs/A-1", "dev-libs/B-1", "dev-libs/A-2", "dev-libs/B-2", "dev-libs/C-1", "dev-libs/D-1"], + ignore_mergelist_order = True, + slot_collision_solutions = [], + success = False), + ) + + playground = ResolverPlayground(ebuilds=ebuilds) + + try: + for test_case in test_cases: + playground.run_TestCase(test_case) + self.assertEqual(test_case.test_success, True, test_case.fail_msg) + finally: + playground.cleanup() + + def testBacktrackingGoodVersionFirst(self): """ When backtracking due to slot conflicts, we masked the version that has been pulled @@ -59,3 +97,37 @@ class BacktrackingTestCase(TestCase): self.assertEqual(test_case.test_success, True, test_case.fail_msg) finally: playground.cleanup() + + def testBacktrackWithoutUpdates(self): + """ + If --update is not given we might have to mask the old installed version later. + """ + + ebuilds = { + "dev-libs/A-1": { "DEPEND": "dev-libs/Z" }, + "dev-libs/B-1": { "DEPEND": ">=dev-libs/Z-2" }, + "dev-libs/Z-1": { }, + "dev-libs/Z-2": { }, + } + + installed = { + "dev-libs/Z-1": { "USE": "" }, + } + + test_cases = ( + ResolverPlaygroundTestCase( + ["dev-libs/B", "dev-libs/A"], + all_permutations = True, + mergelist = ["dev-libs/Z-2", "dev-libs/B-1", "dev-libs/A-1", ], + ignore_mergelist_order = True, + success = True), + ) + + playground = ResolverPlayground(ebuilds=ebuilds, installed=installed) + + try: + for test_case in test_cases: + playground.run_TestCase(test_case) + self.assertEqual(test_case.test_success, True, test_case.fail_msg) + finally: + playground.cleanup() |