blob: 66b69a2db45e1ca7436d46493fd452958a4ca158 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE pkgmetadata SYSTEM "https://www.gentoo.org/dtd/metadata.dtd">
<pkgmetadata>
<maintainer type="project">
<email>python@gentoo.org</email>
<name>Python</name>
</maintainer>
<upstream>
<remote-id type="github">facelessuser/bracex</remote-id>
<remote-id type="pypi">bracex</remote-id>
</upstream>
<longdescription lang="en">
Why Bracex over other solutions?
Bracex actually follows pretty closely to how Bash processes braces. It is not a 1:1 implementation of how Bash handles braces, but generally, it follows very closely. Almost all of the test cases are run through Bash first, then our implementation is compared against the results Bash gives. There are a few cases where we have purposely deviated. For instance, we are not handling Bash's command line inputs, so we are not giving special meaning to back ticks and quotes at this time.
</longdescription>
<stabilize-allarches/>
</pkgmetadata>
|
GitWeb
