diff options
| author |   Ilya Volynets <iluxa@gentoo.org> | 2005-06-28 21:44:18 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ilya Volynets <iluxa@gentoo.org> | 2005-06-28 21:44:18 +0000 |
| commit | 7fead1ebdd7ea7499a84494e5ccb1b8ff75a4f3b (patch) | |
| tree | c5299d85f5b0a8f36f0cd45a34a382d48360774d /dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog | |
| parent | Stable on sparc (diff) | |
| download | historical-7fead1ebdd7ea7499a84494e5ccb1b8ff75a4f3b.tar.gz historical-7fead1ebdd7ea7499a84494e5ccb1b8ff75a4f3b.tar.bz2 historical-7fead1ebdd7ea7499a84494e5ccb1b8ff75a4f3b.zip | |
We seem to have yet another unfortunate incident of
keyword-happy developer. There have been numerous
instances of untested unapproved packages being
keyworded, this was discussed time and again, the
issue is mentioned in developer documentation,
added to developer quiz, and voila, we have it again..
This time multiple packages in dev-dotnet/ category
were marked as mips, ~mips, sparc, ~sparc, as well as
working on other arches. It was confirmed that dotnet
doesn't even build on most of these, yet they were
keyworded. Oh well... There seems to be no way to teach
some people.
Removing mips and sparc keywords
Package-Manager: portage-2.0.51.19
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog')
| -rw-r--r-- | dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog | 18 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog b/dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog index dc78f3a53e57..c60cccc6324f 100644 --- a/dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog +++ b/dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog @@ -1,6 +1,22 @@ # ChangeLog for dev-dotnet/ml-pnet # Copyright 2000-2005 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2 -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog,v 1.22 2005/06/21 23:43:27 urilith Exp $ +# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-dotnet/ml-pnet/ChangeLog,v 1.23 2005/06/28 21:44:18 iluxa Exp $ + + 29 Jun 2005; Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com> + ml-pnet-0.6.10.ebuild, ml-pnet-0.6.12.ebuild, ml-pnet-0.7.0.ebuild: + We seem to have yet another unfortunate incident of + keyword-happy developer. There have been numerous + instances of untested unapproved packages being + keyworded, this was discussed time and again, the + issue is mentioned in developer documentation, + added to developer quiz, and voila, we have it again.. + + This time multiple packages in dev-dotnet/ category + were marked as mips, ~mips, sparc, ~sparc, as well as + working on other arches. It was confirmed that dotnet + doesn't even build on most of these, yet they were + keyworded. Oh well... There seems to be no way to teach + some people. *ml-pnet-0.7.0 (21 Jun 2005) |