diff options
author | Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> | 2017-04-08 16:59:30 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> | 2017-04-08 16:59:30 +0200 |
commit | 97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8 (patch) | |
tree | 90a26524b3ebf0c68c05b254f807200e513cd99b /decisions/summary-20070208.tex | |
parent | Improve up to 1/2007 (diff) | |
download | council-97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8.tar.gz council-97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8.tar.bz2 council-97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8.zip |
Improve 2/2007
Diffstat (limited to 'decisions/summary-20070208.tex')
-rw-r--r-- | decisions/summary-20070208.tex | 90 |
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20070208.tex b/decisions/summary-20070208.tex index d8c4ed0..2c3fc14 100644 --- a/decisions/summary-20070208.tex +++ b/decisions/summary-20070208.tex @@ -1,57 +1,77 @@ \summary{2007}{2}{8} +Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{fcb485c179be47d580fc1289dcd06d48} + \agendaitem{Leaving council members} -\index{council!members!retiring}\index{slacker mark} - -Change to council \glep{39} to cover when a Council member is no longer part - of the Gentoo project (the reason/rhyme is irrelevant). The idea is to - streamline slightly the bureaucracy (even if new wording is more verbose). - -Old wording: ``If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any -further meeting - (or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position and a - new election is held to replace that person. The newly elected council member - gets a 'reduced' term so that the yearly elections still elect a full -group.'' - -New wording: - ``If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further meeting - (or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position. - Whenever a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is - irrelevant; they could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then - the next person in line from the previous Council election is offered the - position. If they decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so - forth. If they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new - person, they get the position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly - elections still elect a full group. If the Council does not accept that - person, then a new election is held to choose a new member.'' +\index{council!members!retiring}\index{slacker +mark}\index{council!members!resigning} + +\glep{39} is changed to cover the case when a Council member is no longer part +of the Gentoo project (the reason is irrelevant). The idea is to streamline +slightly the bureaucracy (even if new wording is more verbose). + +Old wording: +\begin{quote} +If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further meeting (or +their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position and a new +election is held to replace that person. The newly elected council member gets +a 'reduced' term so that the yearly elections still elect a full group. +\end{quote} + +New wording, accepted with 6 yes votes: +\begin{quote} +If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further meeting +(or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position. Whenever +a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is irrelevant; they +could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then the next person in +line from the previous Council election is offered the position. If they +decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so forth. If they +accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new person, they get the +position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly elections still elect a +full group. If the Council does not accept that person, then a new election is +held to choose a new member. +\end{quote} \agendaitem{GLEP 23: ACCEPT_LICENSE} \index{ACCEPT_LICENSE} -\glep{23} (ACCEPT_LICENSE) is still valid. Should have asked genone to show up - ahead of time to clarify what was asked. +\glep{23} is still valid. We should have asked \dev{genone} to +show up ahead of time to clarify what was asked.\footnote{This may be related +to discussions in \bug{152593} or in \bug{17367}.} \agendaitem{GLEP 44: Manifest2} -\index{Manifest!format 2} +\index{Manifest!format 2}\index{Manifest!regeneration} +\index{packages!mirror-restricted}\index{packages!without SRC_URI} +\index{SRC_URI} -\glep{44} (Manifest2) is looking good and we'll work on getting the remainder - packages fixed. Idea is to have it in place in the 2007.0 timeframe. +\glep{44} is looking good and we'll work on getting the remaining packages +fixed. The idea is to have it in place in the 2007.0 timeframe. For +unmaintained packages without a valid SRC_URI but with files on the Gentoo +mirrors the SRC_URI can point there. Unmaintained packages without a valid +SRC_URI and without files on the Gentoo mirrors will need to be removed. -\agendaitem{the ``tr1 issue''} +\agendaitem{The ``tr1 issue''} -the tr1 issue (how do we support it properly in dependencies) would be - researched to see what packages actually need it and a decision would be - made at the next meeting. options include eclass, virtuals, ||(atoms). +The tr1 issue\footnote{See \agoref{gentoo-dev}{3d7601d0230fa7fc903b2f4bb99cb326} +and the resulting thread for the background.} (how do we support tr1 support +properly in dependencies) will be researched to see what packages actually +need it and a decision will be made at the next meeting. Options include +eclass, virtuals, $\vert\vert$(atoms). \agendaitem{Mailing list documentation} \index{Reply-To}\index{SPF} -mailing list docs (reply-to and spf) look pretty much done. need to be - converted to guidexml and posted. +The mailing list docs (Reply-To and SPF) look pretty much done. They need to be +converted to guidexml and posted. + + +\agendaitem{Open Floor} + +The idea of keeping keywords of an ebuild in a separate file was discussed and +dismissed. |