summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>2017-04-08 16:59:30 +0200
committerAndreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>2017-04-08 16:59:30 +0200
commit97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8 (patch)
tree90a26524b3ebf0c68c05b254f807200e513cd99b /decisions/summary-20070208.tex
parentImprove up to 1/2007 (diff)
downloadcouncil-97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8.tar.gz
council-97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8.tar.bz2
council-97405da0d493250d19059d9ae20c500b415a41a8.zip
Improve 2/2007
Diffstat (limited to 'decisions/summary-20070208.tex')
-rw-r--r--decisions/summary-20070208.tex90
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/decisions/summary-20070208.tex b/decisions/summary-20070208.tex
index d8c4ed0..2c3fc14 100644
--- a/decisions/summary-20070208.tex
+++ b/decisions/summary-20070208.tex
@@ -1,57 +1,77 @@
\summary{2007}{2}{8}
+Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{fcb485c179be47d580fc1289dcd06d48}
+
\agendaitem{Leaving council members}
-\index{council!members!retiring}\index{slacker mark}
-
-Change to council \glep{39} to cover when a Council member is no longer part
- of the Gentoo project (the reason/rhyme is irrelevant). The idea is to
- streamline slightly the bureaucracy (even if new wording is more verbose).
-
-Old wording: ``If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any
-further meeting
- (or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position and a
- new election is held to replace that person. The newly elected council member
- gets a 'reduced' term so that the yearly elections still elect a full
-group.''
-
-New wording:
- ``If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further meeting
- (or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position.
- Whenever a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is
- irrelevant; they could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then
- the next person in line from the previous Council election is offered the
- position. If they decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so
- forth. If they accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new
- person, they get the position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly
- elections still elect a full group. If the Council does not accept that
- person, then a new election is held to choose a new member.''
+\index{council!members!retiring}\index{slacker
+mark}\index{council!members!resigning}
+
+\glep{39} is changed to cover the case when a Council member is no longer part
+of the Gentoo project (the reason is irrelevant). The idea is to streamline
+slightly the bureaucracy (even if new wording is more verbose).
+
+Old wording:
+\begin{quote}
+If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further meeting (or
+their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position and a new
+election is held to replace that person. The newly elected council member gets
+a 'reduced' term so that the yearly elections still elect a full group.
+\end{quote}
+
+New wording, accepted with 6 yes votes:
+\begin{quote}
+If a council member who has been marked a slacker misses any further meeting
+(or their appointed proxy doesn't show up), they lose their position. Whenever
+a member of the Council loses their position (the reason is irrelevant; they
+could be booted for slacking or they resign or ...), then the next person in
+line from the previous Council election is offered the position. If they
+decline, it is offered to the next person in line, and so forth. If they
+accept and the current Council unanimously accepts the new person, they get the
+position with a 'reduced' term such that the yearly elections still elect a
+full group. If the Council does not accept that person, then a new election is
+held to choose a new member.
+\end{quote}
\agendaitem{GLEP 23: ACCEPT_LICENSE}
\index{ACCEPT_LICENSE}
-\glep{23} (ACCEPT_LICENSE) is still valid. Should have asked genone to show up
- ahead of time to clarify what was asked.
+\glep{23} is still valid. We should have asked \dev{genone} to
+show up ahead of time to clarify what was asked.\footnote{This may be related
+to discussions in \bug{152593} or in \bug{17367}.}
\agendaitem{GLEP 44: Manifest2}
-\index{Manifest!format 2}
+\index{Manifest!format 2}\index{Manifest!regeneration}
+\index{packages!mirror-restricted}\index{packages!without SRC_URI}
+\index{SRC_URI}
-\glep{44} (Manifest2) is looking good and we'll work on getting the remainder
- packages fixed. Idea is to have it in place in the 2007.0 timeframe.
+\glep{44} is looking good and we'll work on getting the remaining packages
+fixed. The idea is to have it in place in the 2007.0 timeframe. For
+unmaintained packages without a valid SRC_URI but with files on the Gentoo
+mirrors the SRC_URI can point there. Unmaintained packages without a valid
+SRC_URI and without files on the Gentoo mirrors will need to be removed.
-\agendaitem{the ``tr1 issue''}
+\agendaitem{The ``tr1 issue''}
-the tr1 issue (how do we support it properly in dependencies) would be
- researched to see what packages actually need it and a decision would be
- made at the next meeting. options include eclass, virtuals, ||(atoms).
+The tr1 issue\footnote{See \agoref{gentoo-dev}{3d7601d0230fa7fc903b2f4bb99cb326}
+and the resulting thread for the background.} (how do we support tr1 support
+properly in dependencies) will be researched to see what packages actually
+need it and a decision will be made at the next meeting. Options include
+eclass, virtuals, $\vert\vert$(atoms).
\agendaitem{Mailing list documentation}
\index{Reply-To}\index{SPF}
-mailing list docs (reply-to and spf) look pretty much done. need to be
- converted to guidexml and posted.
+The mailing list docs (Reply-To and SPF) look pretty much done. They need to be
+converted to guidexml and posted.
+
+
+\agendaitem{Open Floor}
+
+The idea of keeping keywords of an ebuild in a separate file was discussed and
+dismissed.