diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt | 118 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt.asc | 16 |
2 files changed, 134 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt b/meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..60aef6e --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ + +Summary of the council meeting 10/Dec/2017 + +Agenda announcement: [1] + + +Roll call +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Present: dilfridge, k_f, mgorny, mrueg (proxy for tamiko), slyfox, + ulm, williamh +Absent: - + + +Lack of enough package maintainers [2] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +While it is clear that there is a lack of package maintainers, the +solution for that problem is not clear. In a corresponding +brainstorming the following topics were touched (without any decisions +or votes): + +* Some sort of recruitment drive could be done, for example starting + at FOSDEM. +* Presence at conferences and in the social media is important. +* drobbins suggested that Funtoo people could provide support that is + proxied into Gentoo. +* There's no significant recruiter backlog; recruiting is going quite + smoothly for competent candidates +* Making visible which packages need help and which of those are + critical is important. This touches on the question what "critical" + precisely means, and in turn on gentoostats-like usage statistics + collection. +* Should maintainer-needed packages ever become stable? + + +Update of GLEP 42 [3,4] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +The linked changes [4] to GLEP 42 (mainly dropping the requirement of +detached OpenPGP signatures) were approved by unanimous vote. + + +Final review of GLEP 74 [5,6] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +GLEP 74 was approved by unanimous vote. + + +Restricting gentoo-dev/-project posting [7] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +A lengthy discussion on moderating of or restricting posting to the +gentoo-dev and gentoo-project mailing lists took place. This also +touched how topics should be distributed across the lists and whether +an additional mailing list would be useful. + +Vote: "Do we want a public mailing list with posting restricted to +Gentoo developers (+ voiced contributors)?" +- 2 no votes, 3 yes votes, 2 votes "yes if that list is gentoo-dev" + +Vote: "Do we want a topic split, i.e., technical versus +organizational, similar as now between gentoo-dev and gentoo-project +mailing list?" +- 5 yes, 2 abstain + +Vote: "Shall official business (eg. council-relevant things) take +place on non-restricted lists?" +- 2 yes, 4 no, 1 abstain + +Vote: "Shall all official business take place on restricted lists?" +- 4 no, 3 yes + +Vote: "We restrict -dev and keep -project open; council discussions go +to -project for now." +- 6 yes, 1 no + +After announcement and a grace period of 1-2 weeks, posting to the +gentoo-dev mailing list will be restricted to +* @gentoo.org e-mail holders (i.e., Gentoo developers) +* and whitelisted further contributors. + +Maintaining the whitelist will be done in a similar fashion as the +Bugzilla bugedit group is handled now, with one vouching developer +required. + + +Open bugs with council participation +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +Bug 637274 ("Missing summaries for 20170514 and 20170611 council + meetings", [8]): + This is work in progress. + +Bug 637328 ("GLEP 14 needs to be updated", [9]): + k_f will follow this up with the security team. + +Bug 635344 ("[TRACKER] manifest-hashes replacement", [10]): + This is well underway and can be closed or reassigned. + + +Open floor +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + +* The council agrees that kicking and moderation should be restricted + to the meeting chair for the duration of a council meeting. + + +[ 1] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/530b8878cba3973f40b7ea52720056fc +[ 2] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/4771bc564060b7ab1f64d5c094105493 +[ 3] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/6f070b64892d2e351bd51b2ffa1dc64e +[ 4] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/glep.git/log/?h=glep42-update +[ 5] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/7d189934e371842fc799ba1eead3d01f +[ 6] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0074.html +[ 7] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/6e7cc13cd850be7dbd86376d3a197a16 +[ 8] https://bugs.gentoo.org/637274 +[ 9] https://bugs.gentoo.org/637328 +[10] https://bugs.gentoo.org/635344 diff --git a/meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt.asc b/meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt.asc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cc9015c --- /dev/null +++ b/meeting-logs/20171210-summary.txt.asc @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFGdxwe/u8PZYCpJCIc8iATlRFHYFAlpPiN0ACgkQIc8iATlR +FHYLpQ/+LaQIn6JzLEi/WTZly+JYQ619DE6dL+Qm/51VQwpHi4tA1YjEl6BRkaxc +mAMR3y/CvujredQS2b0lYJsZtFQRZXFiM1P6n0gaYhE/SuN/Yn5ELNAHXvVroTcI +MANaEuqd+oqbi6Q1BFRY9YOCdIwf47EEuLMoPVJFESruGPVVme3T6oGM9ABGn3pX +MdL2fj2sCW/PGWsf1MDRi5PJcDAUK72aKYiOOqYOdZsKyb7uRZk+wiK+c65INHP6 +nfvXLRiQrowcDAX9mUnohycTwBVodmRoihUWXPp1EFzHzg7xP4WYhyctIUPh2Jmp +X0Zjh7n5CrMWNX0EsVrKByCtaZQhvmHLowbcUDecdWPrb4tO1X+YX4LDcwchKxOi +lhd2quE4XHgm1IDTone5QE/V08yC3QOyfolaHXiLVtHCTpD1TKMib/BTxpPuxT8n +Q1WpFkuy795NxFYF/VcU2QCRJ8r7w2k8cPRbd1d8kM/kj+DQa0lOd5vf5SCney2t +cAfpZxHMhTEhLgI+7uU34SV9UgHzUOHirkDBtd6FvrDDMvVlo2CaCaOh+NRa2RzO +IuZLEIoMIk4J0jdda39qDZunbJntPb2tFs4xRVsSljXS+2j5/UYJAs9yQZGY/BhS +i78P2qmycHW1RPV/39r5aJ7FmJcBMDSxIqe9IZjGNIIZegavyeE= +=uvSy +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |