decisions/summary-20051013.tex


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

\summary{2005}{10}{13}

Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{e5c1d34313ea26aa293c9bd7a6795458}

\agendaitem{Review of GLEP 41 (Making Arch Testers official Gentoo Staff)}

\glep{41} was rejected due to the following criticisms:
\begin{itemize}
\item ATs should get an e-mail address on a subdomain (user@xxx.gentoo.org)
\item ATs should get read-only access to livecvs
\item ATs should get a longer probation period to make sure they know their way 
      around
\item Either ATs get same privileges as current "staff", or they get a new
     classification other than "staff" or "dev" (voting, access to resources,
     etc...)
\end{itemize}