blob: 46782d80f6462865a93b4b19ec33b22a0e32b4e1 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
\summary{2007}{6}{14}
Agenda call: \agoref{gentoo-dev}{f9049f5782d6b6929374d45acda0b8e7}
\agendaitem{Council membership}
\index{council!members}
The Council approves by vote that \dev{jaervosz} takes the seat vacated by
\dev{kloeri}.
\agendaitem{Using Git to access the PMS repo}
\index{package!dev-vcs/git}\index{PMS}
\dev{robbat2} shall write documentation on using Git to access the PMS
repository (which presently just mirrors the external SVN repository). \dev{spb}
is to bug \dev{robbat2} if he doesn't get that documentation.
\agendaitem{Handling of mailing lists, including proctors and moderation}
\index{mailing lists}\index{mailing list!gentoo-project}
\index{mailing list!gentoo-dev}\index{project!proctors}
\index{Code of Conduct}\index{freenode!catalyst}
\index{project!devrel}
A lengthy discussion about handling of the mailing lists, including proctors and
moderation, took place.\footnote{This is the first council meeting after the
proctors were instated and tried to implement bans, which were quickly revoked
on the insistence of \dev{wolf31o2} (?). Citations needed.} This discussion
specifically included the question whether the Proctors should get more time
to establish themselves.
A vote is proposed for:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
A separate unmoderated gentoo-project mailing list is created (in the fashion of
Debian's -project).
\item
The gentoo-devel list becomes moderated for non-@gentoo senders, as well as any
@gentoo senders that have flame-ish tendencies.
\item
Moderators are a seperate and more open group from proctors. They are mainly
developers, and are expected to show good judgement (see Catalyst item).
\end{enumerate}
The decision is made to send the above to -dev list for discussion, and have an
intermediate meeting in 2 weeks. A non-binding vote by council\footnote{Non-binding
since there's ``a screen full of people wanting us to not vote on this today''
who can't speak on the moderated channel...} gets 4 yes votes and one no.
\dev{musikc} had sent an email to the Council about the proctors process and
the CoC. This leads into a discussion of the FreeNode Catalyst system, which was
a partial basis for the CoC. There was rough agreement that in an ideal world
all developers should act as positive catalysts, but this is a lot harder than
it seems.
In addition there was consensus that Devrel should work together with the
Proctors on procedures for applying their ``powers''; a revised proposal shall
be presented in a week.
\begin{enumerate}
\item
The moderation discussion needs to be integrated into \dev{musikc}'s document.
\item
More catalyst material should be added into the CoC per Proctor's revisions.
\end{enumerate}
|
GitWeb
