1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
|
20:00 * NeddySeagoon bangs the virtual gavel to open the Jan 20, 2013 Trustees Meeting
20:00 <@NeddySeagoon> Roll call
20:00 <@NeddySeagoon> robbat2, quantumsummers dabbott rich0 ?
20:00 <@dabbott> here glad you made it :)
20:01 <@NeddySeagoon> I knackered but I'm here :)
20:01 <@NeddySeagoon> I should be logging - both my VPS and my shiney new dedicated servers are here
20:02 <@quantumsummers> howdy folks
20:02 <@dabbott> hi Dad
20:02 <@NeddySeagoon> hi quantumsummers - hows things ?
20:02 <@quantumsummers> really well, thanks. My son turns 1 in 3 days
20:03 <@quantumsummers> getting big, walking, etc
20:03 <@NeddySeagoon> talking? getting cheeky? curious .. always asking why ?
20:04 <@NeddySeagoon> We'll give rich0 and robbat2 a few minuites
20:04 <@NeddySeagoon> but we have a quorum
20:04 <@quantumsummers> heh, not talking too much yet
20:04 <@quantumsummers> just a few words, etc
20:05 <@NeddySeagoon> heh - Mum, Dad, beer ... just the essentials
20:05 <@dabbott> tits
20:05 <@NeddySeagoon> That will be Mom not Mum
20:06 <@NeddySeagoon> OK, thats 5 min past so lets start.
20:06 <@NeddySeagoon> Copyright Policies ... we have to nail this one, its important to everyone who contributes
20:07 <@quantumsummers> main thing we need to do is keep it easy to contrib
20:08 <@NeddySeagoon> Copyright the Foundation is just a convience, so we can be the target of action and take action on Gentoo owned code. As long as we have a licence to use the code, copyright is no so important
20:08 <@quantumsummers> I agree with NeddySeagoon
20:09 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, where are you getting with legal advice? Can we usefully start a public discussion yet ?
20:09 <@quantumsummers> I think we can. The SFLC is a fan of a CLA-type document generally
20:09 <@quantumsummers> however, I think some broad discussion would be good
20:10 <@quantumsummers> I would consider posting to a ML of other OSS non-profits
20:10 <@quantumsummers> if you guys think it would be good
20:10 <@NeddySeagoon> Greg-KH seems to have some strong opinions - make sure he sees the discussion
20:10 <@quantumsummers> we are somewhat unique in comparison, since we are a distro, not a software project
20:10 <@quantumsummers> Greg is on that list
20:11 <@quantumsummers> I will CC all trustees individually
20:11 <@NeddySeagoon> well, we package upstream - our IPR is portage and the tree. Does that make us a distro ?
20:11 <@quantumsummers> in fact, I would like to see you all on that list anyway
20:11 <@rich0> I'm here...
20:11 <@NeddySeagoon> welcome rich0
20:11 <@rich0> Got the time wrong...
20:11 <@quantumsummers> we package and sometimes patch
20:11 <@quantumsummers> hi Rich
20:12 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, ok. Do you have a link for that ML ?
20:12 <@quantumsummers> at any rate, this is something we should discuss in daylight
20:12 <@quantumsummers> NeddySeagoon: its private, but let me see if I can find a link
20:12 <@rich0> I need to ping some of the contacts I reached out to before the holidays.
20:12 <@quantumsummers> JacobKM from django invited me
20:12 <@rich0> We did have a discussion on -nfp thouhg.
20:12 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, can you organise invites ?
20:12 <@quantumsummers> yes
20:12 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, please do then
20:13 <@rich0> What are we doing?
20:13 <@quantumsummers> this list http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/foundations
20:13 * NeddySeagoon is sipping a beer
20:13 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, all of them ?
20:14 <@quantumsummers> NeddySeagoon: all of whom?
20:14 <@quantumsummers> OSS foundations?
20:14 <@quantumsummers> no
20:14 <@quantumsummers> but a large number
20:14 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, forget it. Can we subscribe trustees@ ?
20:14 <@quantumsummers> no
20:14 <@quantumsummers> needs to be an individual
20:14 <@quantumsummers> human
20:14 <@quantumsummers> from what I recall of the rules
20:14 <@NeddySeagoon> I'm OK with that
20:14 <@quantumsummers> its a good list
20:15 <@quantumsummers> low traffic
20:15 <@quantumsummers> I mostly lurk
20:15 <@rich0> From the discussion on our own lists it seemed like there really wasn't much consensus for having the foundation own copyright on our projects.
20:16 <@rich0> At least a few basically said they'd stop contributing if that were the policy, most notably Greg.
20:16 <@quantumsummers> seems like we can make it optional, as long as the license it free
20:16 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, I've filled in the form
20:16 <@rich0> I was thinking that a KDE-like approach would make sense.
20:16 <@rich0> They make it optional.
20:16 <@quantumsummers> makes sense to me
20:16 <@rich0> And use the FSFe FLA.
20:17 <@rich0> That leaves us with details like what to do with our copyright notice lines. That could use some legal advice. Not sure what KDE does there - should be easy enough to check on that.
20:17 <@NeddySeagoon> Once we have boild down the useful options have the discussion on -nfp and an announce on -announce
20:17 <@rich0> We did have discussion already.
20:17 <@rich0> Though not a final proposal.
20:17 <@quantumsummers> good to note that you are talking mainly EU-type policy
20:18 <@rich0> Well, the FLA is designed to handle both US and EU regimes.
20:18 <@quantumsummers> ah, good
20:18 <@rich0> We should have a clear policy that everybody agrees to when becoming a dev - just stating that they license their contributions under GPL2+, and so on.
20:18 <@rich0> Even that gets a bit messy now that we have eudev.
20:19 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, I'm not sure our copyright lines have any legal standaing as nobody ever filled in a copyright assignment form. fmmcor thought that the line in ebuilds would be OK in the USA though
20:19 <@rich0> If we won't hold contributions I'd really prefer the GPL2+ to GPL2, otherwise we're stuck like Linux.
20:19 <@rich0> NeddySeagoon, I'm not sure either. That's why we need to come up with a new policy on those.
20:19 <@rich0> We can't have every ebuild have at the top a list of everybody who ever contributed to that one ebuild.
20:19 <@rich0> Or I guess we could, but that would be a mess.
20:19 <@rich0> Would like to have something reasonably simple.
20:20 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, nope, nor can we list every contributor in a file - we don't even know them all
20:20 <@rich0> Maybe something generic, like copyright gentoo developers, see cvs log for current list of contributors or something.
20:20 <@rich0> That definitely requires legal advice.
20:20 <@NeddySeagoon> what about non dev contributions from bugs ?
20:21 <@quantumsummers> a separate "contributors" file would suffice, but I thought that the cvs/git log would be sufficient
20:21 <@NeddySeagoon> do we know enough yet to post on -nfp ?
20:21 <@rich0> Well, Linux does it like this: Copyright (C) 1995-1996 Linus Torvalds & authors (see below)
20:22 <@NeddySeagoon> yeah - its maintaining the see below ...
20:22 <@rich0> They also have a concept of signoff where the person doing the commit declares that the code is unencumbered and GPL2.
20:22 <@NeddySeagoon> I like that
20:22 <@rich0> That is also my concern.
20:23 <@rich0> In Linux they seem to stick a header in every file that varies.
20:23 <@dabbott> can we remove the copyright from ebuilds
20:24 <@NeddySeagoon> Lets stop this here - it sonds like there are too many options to open discussion on -nfp just yet
20:24 <@rich0> We already opened discussion on this.
20:24 <@rich0> Thought it must not have been on -nfp - it wasn't in the archives.
20:24 <@NeddySeagoon> dabbott, as nobody signed a copyright assignment ... maybe
20:25 <@rich0> Err, it was discussed, but the archives are incomplete...
20:25 <@quantumsummers> gentoo-dev too, seems the discussion was split
20:25 <@rich0> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/82061
20:25 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, it wasn't organised - it started from eudev changing all the copyright notices ... which was just wrong
20:26 <@rich0> Well, in any case, I think the discussion was still useful.
20:26 <@quantumsummers> it is/was
20:26 <@rich0> I was mainly interested in general direction, not details.
20:26 <@quantumsummers> seems like I had a point to add, but never finished the email.
20:26 <@rich0> It sounds like we're going to move away from foundation ownership.
20:26 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, it was
20:26 <@rich0> I think the next step is to focus on that direction and step down a level in detail.
20:26 <@quantumsummers> mainly: if you an an independent contractor the IP rules are different for software projects and generally not considered "work for hire"
20:27 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, agreed
20:27 <@rich0> The copyright line will be a big issue. So will be tracking what licenses are used by what files, and ensuring contributors are aware they are licensing appropriately.
20:27 <@quantumsummers> yes
20:27 <@dabbott> yep
20:27 <@rich0> I also want to make sure we don't get stuck on GPL2 - so everybody really needs to license 2+
20:28 <@NeddySeagoon> If we revert copyright to original authors, I don't see it being an issue
20:28 <@rich0> At least for all new contributions - we could argue that past ones are already covered, or not, but over time that becomes less of an issue.
20:28 <@rich0> It is if we want to make Gentoo GPL4+ or something in the future.
20:28 <@rich0> We can do that if we're 2+, not if we're 2-only.
20:29 <@NeddySeagoon> copyright and licence are separate issues
20:29 <@rich0> Maybe we'll never do that, but seems wise to be prepared for it.
20:29 <@rich0> Sure, but it is still something that we need covered by the policy.
20:29 <@rich0> If we don't have copyright, then we need a license to use our own code.
20:29 <@NeddySeagoon> agreed
20:29 <@rich0> So we need to make sure we get that from contributors, much as linux/etc does.
20:29 <@NeddySeagoon> but the code is licences anyway
20:30 <@NeddySeagoon> lets move on
20:30 <@rich0> So, what are our next steps then?
20:31 <@quantumsummers> I have requested invitations for each trustee to the floss foundations list I mentioned above
20:32 <@NeddySeagoon> Consolidate what we know for the advice we have and open a discussion on -nfp. Seek more advice if we don't yet have enough and a view of how we want to end emp
20:32 <@NeddySeagoon> When we go to -nfp it should be with a reccommendation
20:32 <@rich0> Ok, I'll open a next-steps discussion on -nfp
20:32 <@quantumsummers> we need to formalize what the KDE-type agreement actually means for Gentoo in practice
20:32 <@dabbott> thanks rich0
20:32 <@rich0> Maybe send it to trustees@ first
20:32 <@quantumsummers> as it seems like that is the best option
20:32 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, sould like a plan
20:32 <@quantumsummers> +1
20:33 <@rich0> It will be a straw man that actually starts to look like a policy document.
20:33 <@rich0> Greg/etc can pick it apart, and that is fine.
20:33 <@rich0> Once we get past that we can start getting formal legal advice.
20:33 <@rich0> I might also re-ping the FSF/etc.
20:33 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, make sure Greg knows its there
20:33 <@rich0> They basically took a big holiday break.
20:33 <@NeddySeagoon> yes - that sounds good
20:33 <@rich0> Oh, I'll CC to dev-announce to start it.
20:33 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, Certified Public Accountant and 501(c)(3) registration status
20:33 <@rich0> Greg hasn't had trouble notcing them so far. :)
20:34 <@NeddySeagoon> hehe
20:34 <@quantumsummers> nothing too interesting to report here. I know that Rich was asking earlier about filings, etc. We are all finished there (save reimbursing postage for David and I)
20:35 <@NeddySeagoon> I was expecting an invoice from the CPA
20:35 <@quantumsummers> I need to run a couple things by our SFLC contact soon regarding the 1023 app
20:35 <@rich0> Can you send me dates for the tracker?
20:36 <@quantumsummers> NeddySeagoon: yes, let me talk with them in the morning. It can take them 90 days to invoice (something I found odd, but whatever)
20:36 <@rich0> Oh, and that includes the 990, AG-Missouri, annual report Missouri, and annual report New Mexico?
20:36 <@quantumsummers> rich0: annual report was filed by Nov 15th
20:36 <@rich0> Which one?
20:36 <@quantumsummers> the exact day, I do not recall
20:36 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, thats your bit next.
20:36 <@quantumsummers> let me find my notes
20:36 <@rich0> I'll just put down Nov, but I want to make sure we hit them all.
20:36 <@quantumsummers> surely
20:37 <@rich0> There are 4 documents in all.
20:37 <@NeddySeagoon> the NM one is filed and the web site updated
20:37 <@quantumsummers> yep
20:37 <@dabbott> rich0: there is no Missouri afaik
20:37 <@rich0> dabbott, are you saying it wasn't done, or that you don't think we need to do it?
20:38 <@dabbott> i don't think it was ever set up
20:38 <@quantumsummers> nope. the initial paperwork was not filed. I stopped it for some reason.
20:38 <@quantumsummers> I need to locate my notes
20:38 <@quantumsummers> the main reason was to simplify banking
20:38 <@rich0> Ah, in that case I can drop it from the tracker.
20:38 <@quantumsummers> which is not super important at the moment
20:38 <@quantumsummers> iirc
20:38 <@quantumsummers> let me check on some things here
20:39 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0 over to you and the tracker ...
20:39 <@rich0> Np either way - that is why we have a tracker. :)
20:39 <@rich0> Just want to check the boxes.
20:39 <@rich0> Well, the tracker just shows the 4 reports I listed above as past-due.
20:39 <@rich0> If both the 990 and the NM reports are done in Nov I can update that.
20:40 <@rich0> The other two I can leave on the list until somebody confirms we never filed, unless we're sure about that now.
20:40 <@dabbott> NM done 990 not sure
20:40 <@rich0> Ok, then I'll only mark NM done.
20:40 <@NeddySeagoon> ok
20:40 <@rich0> The 990 is definitely due though, or at least a request for extension.
20:40 <@quantumsummers> 990-N
20:40 <@quantumsummers> http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Annual-Electronic-Filing-Requirement-for-Small-Exempt-Organizations--Form-990-N-(e-Postcard)
20:40 <@quantumsummers> that is what was filed
20:40 <@rich0> Also, can we get some kind of private git repo for this stuff.
20:41 <@rich0> Scans and such?
20:41 <@quantumsummers> since we have <50,00 in gross receipts per year
20:41 <@rich0> Seems way too painful to figure out if we did something or not.
20:41 <@quantumsummers> rich0: been asking for that for awhile
20:41 <@rich0> Maybe we should ping infra/Robin or something?
20:41 <@quantumsummers> the e-filed 990-N was very simple
20:41 <@NeddySeagoon> Its on -infras todo list
20:41 <@quantumsummers> our CPA actually did it
20:41 <@rich0> Ok, so we're sure 990 was done then?
20:42 <@NeddySeagoon> Lets move on to item 4 Bugs
20:42 <@rich0> If so I'll mark it as Nov-2012?
20:42 <@quantumsummers> I am still waiting for amended forms for previous years
20:42 <@quantumsummers> since we need some done
20:42 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, where from ?
20:42 <@quantumsummers> at any rate, there is no penalty
20:42 <@rich0> Ok, and are we sure we're not filed in Missouri?
20:42 <@quantumsummers> the beginning of the foundation to 2009 or 2010
20:42 <@rich0> Wasn't sure if that was a confirmed yes/no.
20:42 <@quantumsummers> rich0: yes, sure
20:42 <@rich0> ok, I'll drop those then.
20:42 <@quantumsummers> positive
20:42 <@rich0> That's it for the tracker.
20:43 <@NeddySeagoon> Lets move on to item 4 Bugs
20:43 <@quantumsummers> there were some reasons that I wrote down to let you all know, but I am having some trouble finding the notes
20:43 <@quantumsummers> mainly, not necessary at this time
20:43 <@quantumsummers> per cpa recommendation
20:44 <@NeddySeagoon> Bug 447486 is the first one that needs discussion
20:45 <@quantumsummers> ah, I think should be ok, no?
20:45 <@NeddySeagoon> Originally I was in favour ... but it seems poor value for money
20:45 <@NeddySeagoon> Also, why not an infra box if there is one ?
20:45 <@dabbott> the more i think about it he needs a fully sponsered box for stages not personal
20:45 <@quantumsummers> we have sufficient HW for his purposes, I believe
20:45 <@rich0> ++
20:46 <@quantumsummers> its a matter of getting infra to finish up the ganeti nodes
20:46 <@quantumsummers> and make the easily available
20:46 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, if we say yes we have to say yes to other similar applcations
20:46 <@rich0> I too would rather spend a bit more on an infra box if we needed it than having critical stuff going on elsewhere.
20:46 <@rich0> Plus, that stuff needs to be documented and such.
20:46 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, +1
20:46 <@dabbott> rich0: agreed
20:46 <@quantumsummers> in this case, let's not fund this request. Whomever sees Jorge next buys him some beers
20:46 <@rich0> Seems like stages break from time to time because only a few do them and knowledge is too compartmentalized.
20:47 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, that will be robbat2 at FOSDEM
20:47 <@rich0> And if he wants to work with infra and they come back with a proposal I'm all for it.
20:47 <@quantumsummers> very good
20:47 <@dabbott> yes
20:47 <@NeddySeagoon> Who will comment on the bug ?
20:47 <@quantumsummers> we could even purchase a dedicated machine for him to use, in the case we do not have the HW. However, I think we do
20:47 <@quantumsummers> I will comment
20:48 <@NeddySeagoon> thanks quantumsummers
20:48 <@dabbott> yep thanks quantumsummers
20:48 <@NeddySeagoon> I think the others can wait ... the copyright stuff we have already discussed anyway
20:49 <@NeddySeagoon> 6. Membership Applications
20:49 <@NeddySeagoon> Community Members Damien Moody based on work on Gentoo Studio
20:49 <@dabbott> yes
20:49 <@rich0> seconded :)
20:49 <@rich0> aye
20:50 <@NeddySeagoon> I've provided encouragement and support to this project so am not neutral
20:50 <@quantumsummers> aye
20:50 <@NeddySeagoon> I vote yest too
20:50 <@NeddySeagoon> I'll write the email and ask for his gpg key
20:51 <@NeddySeagoon> Cleanup
20:51 <@rich0> FYi - support and encouragement is not a conflict. :)
20:51 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, thanks
20:51 <@rich0> I'd hope we support and encourage half the stuff we discuss. :)
20:51 <@quantumsummers> email sent
20:51 <@NeddySeagoon> Date of Next Meeting - 17 Feb 2013 19:00 UTC
20:51 <@dabbott> NeddySeagoon: I added a folder for 2013 please put the logs here thanks http://www.gentoo.org/foundation/en/minutes/2013/
20:51 <@quantumsummers> to Jorge
20:51 <@quantumsummers> that meeting, I may miss or be late
20:51 <@NeddySeagoon> dabbott, cvs -d up ?
20:52 <@quantumsummers> will be traveling back home
20:52 <@rich0> wfm
20:52 <@NeddySeagoon> wfm too
20:52 <@quantumsummers> I should be in time, but one never knows
20:52 <@dabbott> fine here
20:53 <@NeddySeagoon> Responsibilities - I'll post the log - It will be from UTC+1 as my new server is in France
20:53 <@dabbott> NeddySeagoon: cat .cvsrc
20:53 <@dabbott> cvs -q -z0
20:53 <@dabbott> diff -u -B
20:53 <@dabbott> checkout -P
20:53 <@dabbott> update -d -P
20:53 <@dabbott> cvs update
20:53 <@quantumsummers> the -d -P is key there
20:53 <@NeddySeagoon> dabbott thanks - I'll need to make a .cvsrc
20:53 <@dabbott> i will do the motions 1
20:53 <@quantumsummers> when are we moving to git ;)
20:53 <@rich0> Ugh - when will we ever get on git. :)
20:53 <@quantumsummers> heheh
20:54 <@rich0> Especially for the website. Don't get why that is still on cvs.
20:54 <@NeddySeagoon> yuck - I barely know enough CVS yet
20:54 <@rich0> I can see why our ebuilds are a mess.
20:54 <@quantumsummers> that financial update bug, that can be closed yeah?
20:54 <@rich0> Actually, you're due on 3-4Q quarterly updates.
20:54 <@quantumsummers> rich0: there was some movement towards git for the web stuff
20:54 <@dabbott> quantumsummers: fine by me
20:54 <@quantumsummers> rich0: I stopped doing quarterly updates
20:54 <@rich0> Oh?
20:55 <@quantumsummers> mainly, they are not necessary
20:55 <@rich0> There was a request back in Sep-Oct to add quarterly updates to the tracker.
20:55 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, isn't that a NM requirement ?
20:55 <@quantumsummers> actually, I never did them
20:55 <@rich0> I'll remove them again.
20:55 <@quantumsummers> not requred, only yearly
20:55 <@quantumsummers> if you guys would like to see some quarterly numbers, I can do that
20:55 <@rich0> Yeah, all the NM stuff is in the tracker.
20:55 <@NeddySeagoon> I'm all for not inventing work
20:55 <@quantumsummers> just seemed like extra wor
20:55 <@quantumsummers> work
20:55 <@rich0> Honestly, I'd really like to see everything in git so we could just see whatever we want.
20:55 <@rich0> And stop pestering you. :)
20:55 <@rich0> But...
20:56 <@rich0> As long as we're approving by line-item I don't think we need the quarterly numbers.
20:56 <@NeddySeagoon> Any other Business ?
20:56 <@quantumsummers> well, I have a gitolite setup with ~400 repos. we could use it for now if you want
20:56 <@quantumsummers> although I think asking infra would take little time
20:56 <@rich0> Well, the thing about git is that it is easy to migrate.
20:57 <@rich0> Just push to a new repository.
20:57 <@rich0> So, I'm all for getting something running now and migrating later.
20:57 <@rich0> But let's aim to get it on infra.
20:57 <@quantumsummers> I love git, been hosting my own setup (first gitosis now gitolite) for 5 years or so
20:57 <@NeddySeagoon> I'm concerned about the bus factor if its not on -infra hardware
20:57 <@rich0> Heck, you can just email bundles around if you have to.
20:57 <@quantumsummers> tis true
20:57 <@quantumsummers> let me see about infra real fast
20:58 <@rich0> Well, as long as it is published SOMEWHERE we can all clone.
20:58 <@rich0> And published on non-infra is better than what we have now.
20:58 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, agreed
20:58 <@rich0> But let's try to get infra going because that is the ideal state.
20:58 <@quantumsummers> poking them now
20:58 <@quantumsummers> we just need 1 repo
20:58 <@NeddySeagoon> Any other Business ?
20:58 <@NeddySeagoon> dabbott, ?
20:58 <@quantumsummers> of course, submodules would be nice for a few things
20:58 <@dabbott> none here
20:59 <@rich0> nope
20:59 <@NeddySeagoon> nothing from me
20:59 <@NeddySeagoon> quantumsummers, AoB ?
20:59 <@quantumsummers> nope
20:59 <@quantumsummers> err wait
20:59 <@quantumsummers> nope (ha ha)
20:59 <@NeddySeagoon> rich0, AoB ?
20:59 <@quantumsummers> I did get the PO from google for GSOC this past year
21:00 <@quantumsummers> I need to add that to the bug
21:00 * quantumsummers hides
21:00 <@NeddySeagoon> Did you invoice too ?
21:00 <@quantumsummers> we were paid in December
21:00 <@NeddySeagoon> Ah ok
21:00 <@quantumsummers> Donnie does the invoicing
21:00 <@quantumsummers> I just collect the money and paperwork
21:00 <@NeddySeagoon> Open Floor
21:02 * NeddySeagoon bangs the virtual gavel to close the meeting
|